Feminine Women Reveal a Lack of Masculinity

Napoleon Hill’s Think and Grow Rich has had a huge impact on the way I think about riches and success. The chapter that continues to influence me the most is his chapter on “The Mystery of Sex Transmutation.” Mostly because no other book has material as forthright as Hill’s material written here. If the concept in this book was distributed today it would have a huge impact on the males of my generation. This chapter written about can be found here.

Napoleon claims that the purpose of the sex desire in men is good for three things. One, the perpetuation of mankind. Two, as a therapeutic agency and, three, as a way to transform mediocrity into genius through transmutation. Hill says this about transmutation: “Sex transmutation is simple and easily explained. It means the switching of the mind from thoughts of physical expression, to thoughts of some other nature” (Hill, 260). Hill believes that sexual expression is the greatest force moving humankind throughout history. He gives many examples of highly sexed men who dominate the history books.

This incredible drive men have to express their sexual desire is the greatest gift that could ever be given to any offspring. This drive makes males more likely to reach a level they can facilitate the use of “creative imagination.” This creative imagination are what many people call the sixth sense geniuses have. Men throughout history have reached this incredible feat. While some men (mutants?),  like Nikola Tesla, have reached this level without the aid of women most men need the femininity to reveal their masculine short comings.

Often, ultra successful men reminisce about their past lovers and how those women revealed the inadequacy of their men when they broke up with them. The women revealed the weakness to these men. This un-masculine weakness holds them back. Now that the weakness is revealed by the rejection of their masculinity they were able to improve upon it. By improving upon their weak spots in their masculinity they were able to increase their odds of reaching creative imagination. The access to this creative imagination helped them achieve great things. While a man could figure this out without a woman, a woman will greatly increase the speed of the process.

For example, I had one high school relationship. For about a year I was not able to assess what the cause of our relationship struggle. My ego was still to greatly involved. About a year after I could look back and see the incredible lack of masculinity I had. Even today memories of our relationship run through my mind and I cringe at the lack. Upon realizing this shortcoming I knew I had to change. I did not date anybody for years as I worked on myself and integrated desirable traits into my personality. By being honest with myself and admitting that I was un-masculine, like the men of Think and Grow Rich did, I opened myself up for greater opportunities through fixing myself. That relationship was, without a doubt, the greatest learning experience of my life.

In modern day society men are told that they are, “great just the way you are.” If any man takes this mindset towards his masculinity he will cease to be masculine. There is no mindset that does more damage to men and women than this one. If a man wants a top tier feminine woman he must in the be top tier of masculinity and, vice versa, for women wanting men. No man is born into the top tier of masculinity.  Men must learn how to be in this top tier. To get to this top tier in a timely way sexual transmutation is absolutely essential. The expression of your sex into “thoughts of another nature” will allow progress at a much faster rate. Even though it will take a long time I urge every striving man to acquire this skill so he may achieve the most he possibly can.

The Left’s Hypocrisy

I often laugh at the Liberal media’s embracing of both Feminism in all it’s form’s while also embracing the LGBT community and Islam. This is an interesting Trichotomy because the gender perceptions from which each group acts according too are completely opponent to one another.

Feminism disparages males inbred natural attraction instincts that are specifically coded into us by years of evolution. When a male looks at a woman he is checking her for reproductive health. Our instinct were formed long before medical reports were available and our eyes were the best things we had to check a woman’s reproductive health. So the pleasure a man feels when looking at a shapely, naked women are his instincts telling him he has found a potential mate. There is nothing wrong with this instinct, in fact it is the best, good thing that could possibly happen. Genes that made men attracted to ugly women died out because nature did not allow their offspring to survive. This male instinct is incredibly important and should not be downplayed or disgraced. Female instincts aren’t denigrated why should straight male’s be? While apparently Feminism has found it acceptable to belie straight male instincts they have not found the same reason to do so with gay males. The ironic thing about gay males is that nobody is a more apparent manifestation of male instincts.

Gay male culture is famous for it’s crudeness. Gay men have sexual intercourse (we can debate about whether it is actually sex later) at a rate much higher than straight men. Also, the filtering mechanism by which gay men choose their possible mates is most often physical attractiveness, the same as straight men. Gay men are men subject male standards of attraction. This is why gay males more often care more for their looks then straight males. Their bodies are toned and they work hard to be appealing because they know they are being physically scrutinized every time they go out. They accept that males predominant filtering mechanism is physical attraction. This is why women relate so well to gay males. Gay males are more understanding of female problem of gaining attention from attractive males. They understand the problems and benefits of a inability/ability to garner attractive or unattractive male’s attention because they too are under intense physical inspection.

Compare this to the gender constructs of Islam where females are “restrained” compared to their western counterparts.  The fact that females have to wear Hijabs in the first place send most Western women up the wall. Now take into account chapter 4, verse 34 in the Qu’ran. This verse explains men’s gender role as Quwwamun. This word translates into lord, master, ruler, governor, manager and bread-winner. Islam encourages male desire by law which could not be more different from the feminized western world.

Each of these three are completely conflicting yet the left continuously convinces them that they are the party for each one of them. This is only the beginning of the contrasts that pervades the left. One has to ask themselves “how do all these conflicting views come to be supported by the same party?” The answer is standards. The further right the party is on the political spectrum the higher it’s standards for participation become. These standards restrict people from  participating in their party. Examples of these restrictions include things like, being an overly hard working man, christian, and socially conservative, which all align in reasoning, thought process and morality. On the other hand, the left has no standards. In order to compete they take on whatever cause they can and promise everything to everybody. The left is like a sleazy lawyer who will represent anybody and everybody regardless of moral conflict in their cases. People who participate in the left have to realize that they participate in a party that promises things to segmented/rejected groups, who band together to compete, they can not fully deliver in order to compete. If you are a person in the middle of the political spectrum I encourage you to lean right solely for the reason that their goals, morality and thinking processes all align.